· 3/29/2001
Belcher Ex Rel. Belcher v. Prudential Ins. Co.
Citations
- 158 F. Supp. 2d 777
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22352
- 2001 WL 327719
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[a]n absent claimant to a limited fund, such as the proceeds of an insurance policy, is ordinarily considered to be an indispensable party to litigation”
- noting that “[a]n absent claimant to a limited fund, such as the proceeds of an insurance policy, is ordinarily considered to be an indispensable party to litigation”
- “determination of the proper beneficiary of an ERISA insurance policy is a federal question governed either by ERISA itself or by federal common law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holschuh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.