Skip to main content
· 3/29/2001

Belcher Ex Rel. Belcher v. Prudential Ins. Co.

Citations

  • 158 F. Supp. 2d 777
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22352
  • 2001 WL 327719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[a]n absent claimant to a limited fund, such as the proceeds of an insurance policy, is ordinarily considered to be an indispensable party to litigation”
  • noting that “[a]n absent claimant to a limited fund, such as the proceeds of an insurance policy, is ordinarily considered to be an indispensable party to litigation”
  • “determination of the proper beneficiary of an ERISA insurance policy is a federal question governed either by ERISA itself or by federal common law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holschuh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.