Bel Oaks Builders, Inc. v. Rice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that policy behind exclusion of such evidence is to promote settlement of disputes between parties
• ‘‘[t]he general rule that evidence of settlement negotiations is not admissible at trial is based upon the public policy of promoting the settlement of disputes’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• appeal was moot where \appeal is from a judgment based on a factual predicate which no longer exists.\
• affirmed on remand, 230 Conn. 641 (1994). There are two kind of nuisances public and private. Weble v. Yale University, 125 Conn. 515 , 524-25 (1939
• ‘‘[t]he general rule that evidence of settlement negotiations is not admissible at trial is based [on] the public policy of promoting the settlement of disputes’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• ‘‘[t]he general rule that evidence of settlement negotiations is not admissible at trial is based [on] the public policy of promoting the settlement of disputes’’ (internal quo- tation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).