· 12/9/2004
Beitner v. Marzahl
Citations
- 819 N.E.2d 1266
- 354 Ill. App. 3d 142
- 289 Ill. Dec. 466
- 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 1497
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[t]he appellate court has held that argumentative language is inappropriate for a statement of facts and against the mandate of the rule”
- “argumentative language is inappropriate for a statement of facts and against the mandate of the rule”
- argumentative language within the statement of facts is inappropriate and against the mandate of the supreme court rules
- argumentative language within the statement of facts is inappropriate and against the mandate of the supreme court rules
- \[t]he appellate court has held that argumentative language is inappropriate for a statement of facts and against the mandate of the rule\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kapala
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.