Beiser v. Weyler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that section 205 removal is allowed in “just about any suit in which a defendant contends that an arbitration clause falling under the Convention provides a defense”
• noting that where “no other grounds for federal jurisdiction exist, the court must ordinarily remand the case back to state court”
• finding that the “contention that the arbitration clauses under the Convention provide a defense was not fanciful.”
• noting that where “no other grounds for federal jurisdiction exist, the court must ordinarily remand the case back to state court”
• noting that where “no other grounds for federal jurisdiction exist, the court must ordinarily remand the case back to state court”
• noting that where “no other grounds for federal jurisdiction exist, the court must ordinarily remand the case back to state court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).