Fifth Circuit· 3/19/2002

Beiser v. Weyler

Citations

284 F.3d 665
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 4364
2002 WL 337799

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that section 205 removal is allowed in “just about any suit in which a defendant contends that an arbitration clause falling under the Convention provides a defense”
noting that where “no other grounds for federal jurisdiction exist, the court must ordinarily remand the case back to state court”
finding that the “contention that the arbitration clauses under the Convention provide a defense was not fanciful.”
noting that where “no other grounds for federal jurisdiction exist, the court must ordinarily remand the case back to state court”
noting that where “no other grounds for federal jurisdiction exist, the court must ordinarily remand the case back to state court”
noting that where “no other grounds for federal jurisdiction exist, the court must ordinarily remand the case back to state court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.