Skip to main content
· 4/23/2020

Beins, Axelrod, P.C. v. Analytics, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of reconsideration where argument on reconsideration raised new arguments and relied on new portions of the record
  • CR 59 does not permit a plaintiff to propose new legal theories that could have been raised before entry of an adverse decision
  • “CR 59 does not permit a [party] to propose new theories of the case that could have been raised before entry of an adverse decision.”
  • appellate court may decline to consider new theories of law raised for the first time in a motion for reconsideration
  • motions to reconsider are left to the sound discretion of the trial court, and we will not reverse a trial court’s ruling absent a showing of manifest abuse of discretion
  • \Motions for reconsideration are addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and a reviewing court will not reverse a trial court's ruling absent a showing of manifest abuse of discretion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge James E. Boasberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.