Skip to main content
· 5/28/1992

Bein v. Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 6 Cal. App. 4th 1387
  • 8 Cal. Rptr. 2d 351
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 7229
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4554
  • 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding security guard who would “more likely than not” get the papers to the right person, and actually did, was “apparently in charge”
  • finding that three attempts at service to defendant’s 15 residence was sufficient to allow substitute service of process
  • finding that three attempts at service to defendant’s residence was sufficient to allow substitute service of process
  • finding three attempts 13 at delivery to defendant’s residence sufficient to allow substitute service
  • discussing meaning of section 12 415.20’s ‘person apparently in charge thereof’ language
  • discussing meaning of section 415.20’s ‘person apparently in charge thereof’ 2 language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sonenshine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.