Behr v. Bell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “After Faretta [v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975) ], it is clear that the trial court may appoint ‘standby counsel’ for a defendant who successfully asserts his right to represent himself at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Behr v. Bell
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-01-04· cited 24×
• Harris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-01-21· cited 20×
• Harris v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-12-26· cited 3×
• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-27· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• English v. McCrary
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-07-13· cited 247×
• Behr v. Gardner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-12-14· cited 11×
• Littlefield v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-09-07· cited 11×
• Hammond v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-07-14· cited 5×