Behl v. Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the appellant waived an argument by de- voting only “three conclusory, redundant sentences” to it
• holding that “perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived”
• concluding that the appellant waived an argument by de- voting only “three conclusory, redundant sentences” to it
• concluding that the appellant waived an argument by de- voting only “three conclusory, redundant sentences” to it
• noting that “perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived”
• noting that “perfunctory and undeveloped arguments, and arguments that are unsupported by pertinent authority, are waived”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).