Behforouz v. Vakil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court properly granted summary judgment on the husband’s loss of consortium claim because it was derivative of the wife’s personal injury claims which failed as a matter of law
• affirming grant of summary judgment to defendant parents because the record revealed that the primary purpose of the plaintiff’s visit to her parents’ home was to pick up her son, “for her own convenience and gratification”
• grant of summary judgment on loss of consortium claim was also proper where claim was derivative of personal injury claims
• grant of summary judgment on loss of consortium claim was also proper because the claim was derivative of personal injury claims
• evidence insufficient to show alter ego does not as a matter of law negate the existence of an agency relationship between the corporations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).