Behers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that inferior courts’ task “is to effectuate the decisional law of this Court, not to restrict it through curtailed readings”
• explaining that it is the duty of the “courts below . . . to effectuate the decisional law of [our Supreme] Court”
• explaining that it is the duty of the “courts below ... to effectuate the decisional law of [our Supreme] Court”
• task of lower courts is “to effectuate the decisional law of this Court, not to restrict it through curtailed readings of controlling authority”
• \[T]o consider 'past practices' not memorialized in the parties’ written agreement would eviscerate the clear and simple rule articulated in Miceli.\
• “We caution the courts below that their task is to effectuate the decisional law of this Court, not to restrict it through curtailed readings of controlling authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).