Behe v. Chester County Board of Assessment Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prevention of a chilling effect on the First Amendment has little application where actual malice, the New York Times v. Sullivan standard, has been shown
• holding that the prevention of a chilling effect on the First Amendment has little application where actual malice, the New York Times v. Sullivan standard, has been shown
• noting that “[c]onciliation rather than formal court proceedings remains the preferred method of settling [discrimination] disputes”
• upholding the exercise of personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state magazine publisher without mention of the first amendment
• affirming without discussion the district court's calculation of back pay award which had deducted unemployment insurance
• affirming judgment for section 1983 plaintiff based upon beatings by police officer.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).