· 11/25/1918
Beever v. Smith
Citations
- 201 Mo. App. 86
- 207 S.W. 238
- 1918 Mo. App. LEXIS 183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- wife, sued with husband on promissory note, precluded from testifying that she signed note at her husband’s request
- “The evident purpose of this provision of the statute is to keep sacred and secret the confidential relations of husband and wife.”
- “[W]hen a third person competent to be a witness is present, then the courts will inquire into the transaction just the same as if no confidential relation existed between husband and wife.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farrington, Jjconcur, Sturgris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.