Skip to main content
· 11/25/1918

Beever v. Smith

Citations

  • 201 Mo. App. 86
  • 207 S.W. 238
  • 1918 Mo. App. LEXIS 183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • wife, sued with husband on promissory note, precluded from testifying that she signed note at her husband’s request
  • “The evident purpose of this provision of the statute is to keep sacred and secret the confidential relations of husband and wife.”
  • “[W]hen a third person competent to be a witness is present, then the courts will inquire into the transaction just the same as if no confidential relation existed between husband and wife.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farrington, Jjconcur, Sturgris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.