Beeter v. Sawyer Disposal LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding payment of a percentage of revenues generated by use of the land did not benefit the land
• holding that “if a covenant contained in a deed does not directly benefit the land as required by N.D.C.C. § 47–04–26, it is personal and is enforceable only between the original parties to the deed” and not subsequent owners of the land
• “[I]f a covenant or deed restriction benefits the grantor personally, and serves no real benefit to the land, then the covenant is personal in nature and does not ‘run with the land’ upon a subsequent sale of the property.”
• “[I]f a covenant or deed restriction benefits the grantor personally, and serves no real benefit to the land, then the covenant is personal in nature and does not ‘run with the land’ upon a subsequent sale of the property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).