Beers v. Maye

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he same standard applies to documents attached to a plaintiffs response in opposition” (citing Robinson, 551 F.3d at 222-23)
• holding that the VCPA applied to the sale of a vehicle with a defective odometer from a dealer to another when selling dealer “knew or should have known that the car was likely to be resold to a consumer to be used for personal purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).