Beers v. Federal Security Administrator

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• citing, inter alia, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, Inc., 537 F.2d 4, 14 (2d Cir. 1976)
• finding “use in commerce” requirement satisfied where defendant offered products on its website using plaintiff’s trademark, but “nowhere allege[d] that consumers actually purchased” defendant’s products
• “[C]ourts have found that the ‘in commerce’ requirement is satisfied where the infringing act had an adverse effect on the plaintiff’s ability to participate in interstate commerce. Use of the Internet also suffices.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).