Beer v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when “the interference with the property right and the damages occurred simultaneously” the injury is a single one and “not a series of recurring injuries”
• explaining that the interference with a property right is “measured by the diminution in the market value of the property,” which “is the difference between the market value of the property before and after” the interference with the right (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).