Beeler v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where “plaintiffs allegedly were compliant with police orders and not violent or resisting arrest,” this fact “suggests that their arrests likely did not necessitate an unusual degree of force”
• observing that a “failure to intervene claim is contingent upon the disposition of the primary claims underlying the failure to intervene claim”
• noting that where “plaintiffs allegedly were compliant with police orders and not violent or resisting arrest,” this fact “suggests that their arrests likely did not necessitate an unusual degree of force”
• instructing “that in order to withstand summary judgment, [a plaintiff] must provide medical evidence that the handcuffs caused serious, long-lasting, or persistent injury”
• denying qualified immunity where police officers placed “excessively tight handcuffs” on a plaintiff who did not resist arrest
• acknowledging plaintiff must comply with notice of claim requirements in order to viably assert malicious prosecution claims against a municipal entity or its employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).