· 10/21/1982
Beegan v. Schmidt
Citations
- 451 A.2d 642
- 1982 Me. LEXIS 830
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that breach of contract claims could have been presented in prior suit where litigant must have known about those facts when she commenced the prior suit
- observing that when there is a final judgment against the plaintiff, claims the plaintiff has against the same defendant are extinguished with regard to all or any part of the transaction, or series of connected transactions, out of which the action arose
- observing that when there is a final judgment against the plaintiff, claims the plaintiff has against the same defendant are extinguished with regard to all or any part of the transaction, or series of connected transactions, out of which the action arose
- observing that when there is a final judgment against the plaintiff, claims the plaintiff has against the same defendant are extinguished with regard to all or any part of the transaction, or series of connected transactions, out of which the action arose
- cases drawing the analytical distinction between claim and issue preclusion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKusick, Godfrey, Nichols, Roberts, Carter, Violette
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.