Beeck v. S.R. Smith Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a minor child’s loss-of-consortium claim for an injured parent is subject to “the statute [of limitations] applicable to minors,” not the statute applicable to the parent
• holding that a minor child’s loss-of-consortium claim for an injured parent is subject to “the statute [of limitations] applicable to minors,” not the statute applicable to the parent
• noting that one factor to consider in giving a decision prospective application only is “the inequity imposed by retroactive application”
• noting that one factor to consider in giving a decision prospective application only is \the inequity imposed by retroactive application\
• “Courts may hold, however, that a particular overruling decision should in fairness have only prospective application.”
• also recognizing interplay between retroactivity and statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).