Beebe v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the prosecutor’s statement “I submit to you that that evidence has not been disputed” was not necessarily a comment on the defendant’s failure to testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Henry v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-03-30· cited 40×
• Richmond v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-05-22· cited 16×
• Evans v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-10-21· cited 11×
• Hendrix v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1992-11-25· cited 9×
• Bradford v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-06-02· cited 8×
• Linquinton Dean v. State of Arkansas
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2021-04-21· cited 6×
• Womack v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1991-11-27· cited 4×
• Beebe v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1990-11-19· cited 2×
• Crawford v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-02-03· cited 2×
• Reynolds v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1992-10-26· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bennett v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1988-11-21· cited 76×
• Duncan v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1987-03-23· cited 74×
• Price v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-04-28· cited 68×
• Golden v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1984-02-15· cited 18×
• Houston v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1987-11-09· cited 17×
• Moser v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1977-10-24· cited 14×
• Wood v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1982-06-21· cited 10×
• Nicholas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1980-02-06· cited 2×