Beebe v. Fraktman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statute governing SRS investigations created only public duty, not duty to child whose father had been reported for suspected abuse
• promise to follow up on a report of abuse was part of a statutory responsibility and didn't create a special duty
• statute governing SRS investigations created only public duty, not duty to child whose father had been reported for suspected abuse
• whether to open file to investigate possible child abuse by father is discretionary
• SRS owed no special duty to a child to investigate abuse even after agency received two reports that child's father was abusing her and promised to follow-up on at least one of the reports
• SRS owed no special duty to a child to investigate abuse even after agency received two reports that child's father was abusing her and promised to follow-up on at least one of the reports

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).