Bedgisoff v. Cushman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \[no] finding of unforeseeability is required before the Commission may reach the conclusion that a rate that was previously just and reasonable is no longer so\
• explaining that under section 13(2) of the Interstate Commerce Act, which “reflect[s] these general doctrinal rules” about filed rates, FERC “has no authority … to apply a change retroactively”
• explaining a rate may be “just and reasonable” even if the methodology underlying it is not “the only reasonable methodology”
• Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s decision to approve part of a contested settlement must be supported by substantial evidence.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).