Bedford v. Port of Hous. Auth.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that individual assessment of class members’ job duties to determine whether they were properly classified as interns was not subject to generalized proof
• noting that \[t]he strictures of both the FLSA and NYLL apply only to employees\
• noting that “the factors [specified] are non-exhaustive—courts may consider relevant evidence beyond the specified factors in appropriate cases”
• noting that “[t]he strictures of both the FLSA and NYLL apply only to employees”
• noting that a “conditionally certified FLSA collective does not acquire an independent legal status”
• adopting a non- | exhaustive set of seven factors to determine whether an individual is a student | intern or an employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).