Bedell v. H.R.C. Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “party invoking jurisdiction” viewpoint “is the one that prevails in this district, and probably the Sixth Circuit”
• stating that “the mere filing in the state court of a pleading raising a defense which might be conclusive of the merits is insufficient for waiver” and that “[tjhere must be further action on the part of the defendant resulting in a decision on the merits of the defense”
• stating 9 defendant’s viewpoint in removal cases involving the amount in controversy requirement “is the one that prevails in . . . probably the Sixth Circuit” and applying defendant’s view when considering motion to remand
• stating 9 defendant’s viewpoint in removal cases involving the amount in controversy requirement “is the one that prevails in . . . probably the Sixth Circuit” and applying defendant’s view when considering motion to remand
• motion to abate and dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).