Skip to main content
· 11/13/1997

Bedard v. Roger Williams University

Citations

  • 989 F. Supp. 94
  • 1997 WL 769363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognising that “federal anti-discrimination laws simply do not provide a remedy for ... social isolation and exclusion from outings which took place outside the scope of employment”
  • “[T]his court agrees with those courts which predictively view the Supreme Court’s ‘next logical step’ as being to recognize a private cause of action under Title IX for employment discrimination against a federally funded education program.”
  • describing “Congress’ intent for a broad sweep under Title IX”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Torres, Lovegreen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.