Bedard v. Roger Williams University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognising that “federal anti-discrimination laws simply do not provide a remedy for ... social isolation and exclusion from outings which took place outside the scope of employment”
• “[T]his court agrees with those courts which predictively view the Supreme Court’s ‘next logical step’ as being to recognize a private cause of action under Title IX for employment discrimination against a federally funded education program.”
• describing “Congress’ intent for a broad sweep under Title IX”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bernice M. COWAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee
  Seventh Circuit· 1998-04-10· cited 48×
• Burrell v. City University of New York
  S.D. New York· 1998-02-26· cited 30×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dial Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 2001-08-14· cited 24×
• Kemether v. Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Ass'n
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-08-06· cited 12×
• Arceneaux v. Vanderbilt University
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-12-28· cited 7×
• Urie v. Yale University
  D. Connecticut· 2004-08-26· cited 4×
• Schoepfer v. UNH
  D. New Hampshire· 1998-04-16