Becton v. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 9658 was inapplicable where plaintiff could not state a claim under CERCLA
• affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants “because [the plaintiff] failed to present substantial evidence that his injuries were caused by exposure to a hazardous substance released into .the environment”
• “the federally mandated discovery rule of [42 U.S.C.] § 9658 has no application to exposure solely within the interior of the workplace”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).