Beckwith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a reasonable defendant would conclude that he was charged under a particular subsection to the exclusion of another subsection when the indictment charged the defendant \in a way which clearly appeared to exclude\ one of those charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tapscott v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-08-31· cited 36×
• State v. Burroughs
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-02-09· cited 14×
• Meanor v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-07· cited 5×
• Dishman v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-12-01· cited 5×
• Shannon v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-06-04· cited 4×
• State v. Ott
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-29· cited 3×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hagans v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-30· cited 83×
• Fisher v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-02-24· cited 12×
• Kleberg v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-06· cited 11×
• Insley v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-06-09· cited 5×
• Beckwith v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-02-08· cited 3×