Beckman v. Wilcox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a “federal court may consider collateral issues [i.e., issues independent of the main proceeding] after an action is no longer pending.” (quoting Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 395, 110 S. Ct. 2447, 110 L. Ed. 2d 359 (1990))
• statutory language suggests that the legislature intended broad application of RCW 8.24.030

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).