Beckley v. Beckley
Citations
- 23 Or. 226
- 31 P. 470
- 1892 Ore. LEXIS 133
Syllabus
<p>Divorce—Cruelty * —Code, §495.—Legal cruelty authorizing a divorce is aterm not easily defined. It is not every threat nor overt act of violence; there must be an intention to ■worry the other. Cruelty is a question of intent,— a mental purpose to wound the feelings of the other party.</p> <p>Husbamd and Wife—Divorce.—A divorce will not be granted upon the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment where it appears that both parties were active in contributing to the injury complained of.</p>
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hengen v. HengenOregon Supreme Court· 1917-07-17· cited 27×
- Crumbley v. CrumbleyOregon Supreme Court· 1920-01-13· cited 19×
- Hawley v. HawleyOregon Supreme Court· 1921-07-30· cited 16×
- Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court· 1923-01-09· cited 16×
- Matlock v. MatlockOregon Supreme Court· 1914-09-15· cited 12×
- Jones v. JonesOregon Supreme Court· 1904-06-27· cited 8×
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa· 1913-12-13· cited 8×
- Kruschke v. KruschkeOregon Supreme Court· 1922-04-18· cited 5×
- Benfield v. BenfieldOregon Supreme Court· 1903-12-14· cited 3×
- Ream v. ReamOregon Supreme Court· 1916-07-11· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.