Beckham v. Hunter
Citations
- 37 Tex. 551
Syllabus
<p>In defense to a suit on a promissory note, the defendants pleaded that their note was made in consideration of the plaintiff’s growing crop, and for the further consideration that they should have the use of the plaintiff’s teams and implements to complete the crop, and that plaintiff would allow his hired hands to pass into the employment of defendants, and complete the crop ; but that the plaintiff, in violation of the contract, took away his teams and implements, and enticed away the hired hands, so that the crop was lost, to defendants’ damage, etc. Held, that this plea in reconvention was competent and sufficient; and the court below erred in striking it out, on exceptions by the plaintiff.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- courts will not infer an agency only from the marital relationship, especially when the petition does not plead such a relationship or use any words that would imply one
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.