Skip to main content

Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.

Citations

  • 401 N.W.2d 655
  • 55 U.S.L.W. 2512
  • 1987 Minn. LEXIS 713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that, on remand, the district court should provide its rationale for denying request for attorney fees so the award could be reviewed by appellate court
  • stating that the supreme court agreed with the appellant that “some of the challenged statements here, when viewed in the light most favorable to him, could be capable of being understood as accusing him of a crime”
  • instructing that wrong burden of proof is fundamental error
  • instructing that wrong burden of proof is fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amdahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.