Becker, H. v. M.S. Reilly, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that orders denying post-trial motions are interlocutory and not ordinarily appealable; the subsequent judgment is the final, appealable order
• framing the issue as whether the trial court should “withdraw its assumed leave and set aside the discontinuance”
• “Rule 229(c) does not require a hearing. It simply requires a petition and notice.”
• orders denying post-trial motions are interlocutory; the subsequent judgment is the final, appealable order
• \Orders denying post-trial motions are interlocutory and not ordinarily appealable\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).