Beck v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when two crimes are essentially dissimilar, one crime may be admitted as a similar transaction at the trial on the other if the State is able to show a logical connection between the crimes
• holding that when two crimes are essentially dissimilar, one crime may be admitted as a similar transaction at the trial on the other if the State is able to show a logical connection between the crimes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Boynton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-07-27· cited 8×
• Chandler v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-06-14· cited 6×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-09-04· cited 1×
• Richard Boynton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-07-27
• Jummul Vincent Thompson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-09-04

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Biggs v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2007-02-26· cited 37×
• Curtis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-10-20· cited 9×
• Huff v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-02-22· cited 8×
• Garcia v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-04-28· cited 3×