Beck v. Reynolds Metals Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court can take judicial notice of \matters of public record\ but cannot credit the disputed factual assertions therein as true
• holding that under Fed. R. Evid. 201 a court may take judicial notice of “matters of public record”
• holding that 5 judicial notice is appropriate for “undisputed matters of public record” but not for “disputed facts 6 stated in public records”
• holding that although the district ~12- | be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of California.” ECF No. 2 |
• holding that the district court erred by relying on extrinsic evidence when ruling 10 on a motion to dismiss
• holding that “The Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of ‘cruel and unusual 19 punishments’ applied only ‘after conviction and sentence.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).