Beck v. Minestrella

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that Lamp was inapplicable because \[a]t no time does the record indicate that [the plaintiff] did anything to impede the service of the various papers or engage in any conduct of any kind 'to stall in its tracks the legal machinery.' \
• recognizing issuance and delivery of writ for service keeps action alive for period equal to original period as measured from the filing date of writ
• ruling that Lamp was inapplicable because “[a]t no time does the record indicate that [the plaintiff] did anything to impede the service of the various papers or engage in any conduct of any kind ‘to stall in its tracks the legal machinery.’ ”
• stating issuance and delivery of writ for service keeps action alive for period equal to original period as measured from the filing date of writ
• stating issuance and delivery of writ for service keeps action alive for period equal to original period as measured from the filing date of writ
• stating issuance and delivery of writ for - 12 - J-A18038-16 service keeps action alive for period equal to original period as measured from the filing date of writ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).