Skip to main content
· 11/23/2000

Beck v. City of Durham

Citations

  • 129 F. Supp. 2d 844
  • 2000 WL 33140713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Additional factual allegations contained in a response brief are not considered on a motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beaty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.