Bechard v. Wissler-Watters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “remand[ing] the case to the district court to enable it to consider whether Plonka is in custody, in which case his § 1983 false arrest claim is barred by Heck, or whether Plonka is not in custody, in which case, under Jenkins and Leather, Heck does not apply”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).