Skip to main content

Beavers v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 881 P.2d 1376
  • 118 N.M. 391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that although a new rule was announced, the first factor weighed in favor of the presumption because a tortfeasor could not be said to rely on the “claimed absence of potential liability for [his] conduct”
  • explaining the availability of selective prospective or modified prospective decisions when the Court explicitly declares such a holding
  • explaining the availability of selective prospective or modified prospective decisions when the Court explicitly declares such a holding
  • adopting the presumption of retroactivity “[bjecause of the eompelling force of the desirability of treating similarly situated parties alike”
  • discussing reliance as a factor in determining the retroactive application of a new rule of law
  • discussing reliance as a factor in determining the retroactive application of a new rule of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Montgomery, Ransom, Frost

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Beavers v. Johnson Controls World Services, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.