Skip to main content
· 5/9/2012

Beaubrun v. State

Citations

  • 88 So. 3d 359
  • 2012 WL 1605392
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Even if the contract could be considered ambiguous, that does not necessarily mean that there is a jury question. The court itself must still declare the meaning of the contract unless the evidence admitted raised a real issue of fact to be resolved by the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ciklin, Gerber, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.