Beatty v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court expressly declined to apply doctrine of invited error to Tex.R.Civ.P. 355, 47 Tex.B.J. 837, 838 (1984, repealed 1986) because requirement to rule timely on contest or otherwise take allegations as true has no exceptions and is jurisdictional requirement
• court expressly declined to apply doctrine of invited error to Tex. R. Civ. P. 355, 47 Tex. B.J. 837, 838 (1984, repealed 1986) because requirement to rule timely on contest or otherwise take allegations as true has no exceptions and is jurisdictional requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).