Beatty v. LaFountaine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mere speculation, guesses, supposition, and conjecture “are not sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact to defeat summary judgment”
• holding that mere speculation, guesses, supposition, and conjecture “are not sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact to defeat summary judgment.”
• concluding “mere speculation cannot create questions of fact. . . . Opinions expressing mere possibility with regard to a hypothetical situation are insufficient to establish a genuine issue of material fact”
• no assumption when owner may have right to inspect or approve work or require contractor to follow safety rules

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).