Beasley v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
Citations
- 115 F. 952
- 53 C.C.A. 434
- 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4267
Syllabus
<p>L Railroads — Contract Restricting Location of Stations — Validity.</p> <p>A contract by which a railroad company agrees to establish and maintain a station at a particular place, and not to establish or maintain any other station within a certain distance therefrom, is contrary to public policy, and cannot be enforced in a court of equity; but it would seem that the illegality of the agreement should not deprive one who on the faith of it, and without wrongful intent, has conveyed valuable property to the company, of a remedy at law.</p> <p>¶1. See Contracts, vol. 11, Cent. Dig. § 570.</p>
Judges: Pardee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court· 1898-05-31· cited 189×
- Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. State ex rel. MayorSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-01-15· cited 52×
- People ex rel. Hunt v. Chicago & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court· 1889-10-31· cited 32×
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. ScottFifth Circuit· 1896-12-01· cited 25×
- Holladay v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court· 1874-08-15· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.