District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/24/2007
Beasley v. State
Citations
- 964 So. 2d 213
- 2007 WL 2403823
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that postcon-viction court’s findings were not supported by competent, substantial evidence where postconviction court chose not to believe appellant’s testimony even though it was unrefuted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Salcines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Cottle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-04-08· cited 111×
- Schwab v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-03-28· cited 28×
- Rudolf v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-08· cited 14×
- Eristma v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-09· cited 10×
- Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-04-12· cited 6×
- Feldpausch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.