Beasley v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an argument that raises a factual dispute “is inappropriate for resolution on a motion to dismiss”
• fraud claims under New York common law must, among other things, allege a materially misleading representation “upon which the plaintiff reasonably relied.”
• “A claim for common law fraud is subject to the particularity pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b), ‘which requires that the plaintiff (1) detail the statements (or omissions) that the plaintiff contends are fraudulent, (2) identify the speaker, (3
• “A claim for common law fraud is subject to the particularity pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b), ‘which requires that the plaintiff (1) detail the statements (or omissions) that the plaintiff contends are fraudulent, (2) identify the speaker, (3
• resolution of factual dispute inappropriate on motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).