Beasley v. Beasley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in the family law context, ordering payment of a “not insignificant” amount of $48,188.15 in attorneys’ fees affected a substantial right
• “Notably, neither Duncan nor Comstock (nor any other case) has interpreted [North Carolina General Statute Section] 50-19.1 through the particular factual lens facing us in the instant appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wing v. Goldman Sachs Tr. Co.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-10-20
• Preston v. Preston
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-04-05
• Brown v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2023-05-02
• Arrington v. Arrington
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-05-07
• Red Valve, Inc. v. Titan Valve, LLC
  North Carolina Business Court· 2019-12-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re: J.H.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-12-01· cited 64×
• Slaughter v. Swicegood
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2004-02-03· cited 61×
• McIntyre v. McIntyre
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2006-01-17· cited 12×
• China Grove 152, LLC v. Town of China Grove
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2015-07-07· cited 10×
• Schneider v. Schneider
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-11-07· cited 7×
• Hanna v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-05-16· cited 5×