Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/18/1975
Beasley v. Beasley
Citations
- 216 S.E.2d 535
- 264 S.C. 611
- 216 S.E.2d 536
- 1975 S.C. LEXIS 391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that alimony should not penalize one party and reward the other
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brailsford, Lewis, Littlejohn, Moss, Ness
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-02-09· cited 103×
- Donahue v. DonahueSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-09-25· cited 100×
- Carrigg v. Carrigg (In Re Carrigg)D. South Carolina· 1981-09-30· cited 30×
- Major v. MajorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-01-21· cited 14×
- Tucker v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-06-22· cited 13×
- Bailey v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-06-06· cited 10×
- Campbell v. McPhersonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-05-02· cited 10×
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-10-19· cited 4×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.