Beasley Forest Products, Inc. v. Durango Georgia Paper Co. (In Re Durango Georgia Paper Co.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that section 503 differs from section 502 because it “needs no complement” and uses different terminology
• discussing 17 instances where “expenses” are distinguished from “claims” in subchapter including sections 502 18 and 503
• explaining that, under § 502(e)(2), the amounts of certain claims “are each to be determined post-petition but are to be treated ‘the same as if such claim had become fixed before the date of the filing of the petition,’ and then allowed or disallowed” (quoting § 502(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).