Bearshield v. John Morrell & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the ICRA claim and noting “‘[t]he inability to perform a single, particular job does not constitute a substantial limitation in the major life activity of working1 ” (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(j)(3)(i) (1997))
• considering the ICRA claim and noting “ ‘[t]he inability to perform a single, particular job does not constitute a substantial limitation in the major life activity of working’ ” (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(j)(3)(i) (1997))
• considering the ICRA claim and noting “ ‘[t]he inability to perform a single, particular job does not constitute a substantial limitation in the major life activity of working’ ” (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(j)(3)(i) (1997))
• “The issue of whether an individual has a disability is a factual question to be decided on a case-by-case basis.”
• same for disability discrimination cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).