Bearden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that sole issue on appeal was whether trial court erred by failing to have defendant examined for competence to stand trial at hearing on State’s motion to adjudicate, thereby implying no judgment of incompetency existed prior to hearing
• explaining that sole issue on appeal was whether trial court erred by failing to have defendant examined for competence to stand trial at hearing on State's motion to adjudicate, thereby implying no judgment of incompetency existed prior to hearing
• explaining that sole issue on appeal was whether trial court erred by failing to have defendant examined for competence to stand trial at hearing on State's motion to adjudicate, thereby implying no judgment of incompetency existed prior to hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bradford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-23· cited 34×
• Durgan v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2006-05-17· cited 16×
• Alice Bradford v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-08-11
• Alice Bradford v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2005-06-23
• Vincent Felipe Martinez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2006-08-31
• Nakeesha Durgan v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2006-05-17
• Richard Robles Vigil v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-07-13

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Phynes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-02-26· cited 499×
• Nava v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2003-05-15· cited 18×
• Davis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-07-20· cited 15×