Skip to main content
· 6/26/2008

Bearden v. International Paper Co.

Citations

  • 529 F.3d 828
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13452
  • 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,257
  • 103 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1032
  • 2008 WL 2521277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the burden is on the employee to prove that the employer’s proffered reason was pretextual
  • finding inference of age discrimination if plaintiff can prove younger person hired for job
  • once legitimate, nondiscriminatory explanation for termination has been proffered, plaintiff has burden to prove reason was merely pretext for discriminatory motive
  • “Plaintiff must offer more than speculation, conjecture, or fantasy in support of claims at summary judgment stage”
  • “The district court did not err in granting summary judgment on [plaintiff’s] EPA claim in light of her failure to provide evidence that she was paid differently for equal work.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Murphy, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.